Saturday, January 29, 2011

Stereotypes: good or bad

So let's talk about stereotypes. In class we briefly touched on them, attributing Herder's writing as stereotyped. What exactly is a stereotype though? The Oxford Dictionary tells us it is "a widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing," This seems to be a solid definition, but I am dissatisfied by it's lack of attention to one of the most important aspects of stereotypes: that fact that they are necessary.
Dr. Johnson actually stated this in class, but did not expound on it much beyond an observation. I feel, however, that the issue of stereotype deserves much attention since it is a huge factor in racism and discussions of racial differences. I'm sure the students in our class have experienced at one time or another the accusation that they had stereotyped some people and then attributed it in their minds to something bad. Don't fret. Stereotypes are a part of the human psyche and, despite what political correctness suggests, stereotypes are absolutely necessary to our experience in the world and therefor not a bad thing. Imagine this; you walk into a room and see thirty people you have never met before. Immediately you scan the crowd; you are looking for people's characteristics, like are they male or female, short or tall, heavy or skinny, and ethnically different from yourself. This is how every person gets a grasp on meeting new people. We look at what's visible and then from that apply a judgment call to those people. From these observances we apply stereotypes. By doing this we have taken a room of thirty people and made it less foreboding and more 'discovered' without ever talking to a single person.

Clearly, this is a seemingly negative way to approach new people. I would agree that the best way to get to know someone is to talk to them and get to know them. This is where stereotypes come into play however; they are not something we can fight or claim freedom from. Stereotypes are the way our mind deals with meeting new individuals. We can to handle the complexities of rediscovering everything from scratch about someone that we meet. Instead, we apply stereotypes and discover how that person deviates over time. Stereotypes therefor are an essential part of our mental survival. We group things, apply labels and assumptions, and ascribe stereotypes. Without doing these we would have to memorize specific characteristics about every person and thing we encounter, which is something we simply don't have the mental capacity to do.

As this applies to race, many stereotypes are, unfortunately, negative. There is a theory that stereotypes, especially negative ones, are perpetuated because it builds up positive feelings in the stereotyper. I can see this a valid especially since there is an inclination for us to improve the perception of ourselves compared to others. Among people, stereotyping attributes to the grouping inclination we have to include certain people as 'us' and others as 'them'. This is simple human nature. All we can hope to do in discovering the truths about others that conflict with our stereotypes is to reevaluate our stereotypes in a more positive light. The stereotypes themselves will never disappear. but hopefully they will become better.


10 comments:

  1. Trent,

    First of all I want to commend you for having the guts to take this one on. It can feel uncomfortable defending stereotypes.

    That being said, I wonder whether you haven't mixed the meanings of discrimination and stereotyping. To discriminate is to take account of the differences between things for the purpose of giving order to our lives, and it certainly is necessary. Stereotyping, on the other hand, requires oversimplification, which necessarily has negative connotations. To discriminate when you enter a room is to notice that there are Blacks, Whites, Asians, etc., but to stereotype is to think "well I should sit next to an Asian because he's great at math and can help me with my homework, but I should avoid the black kids because they probably didn't do theirs." In this way stereotyping does, as you say, make a room "discovered," but it does so along divisive and unfounded lines.

    Making incorrect judgments about others is in no way necessary to our survival. In fact, it harms us by causing unnecessary conflict. That being said, I admit that I succumb to stereotyping, as I'm sure all of us do at some point. Nevertheless, I don't feel that we should pass it off as necessary instead of actively fighting it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Trent. I don't think stereotyping is necessary for our survival. I think that we all succumb to stereotyping more frequently than we think, but I think the concept of discrimination can be seen as more of a way to survive. We are more prone to help out the people that look like us or sit by someone who looks like us. I think stereotypes have a detrimental effect and are extremely negative. Yes, I think that stereotypes can be broken by simply having a conversation with someone, but it is impossible to have a conversation with every Asian or black person, so the necessary means to end the thoughts have to be done within the person who holds those stereotypes in mind.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is human nature to make judgments about people, places, situations, etc; such discrimination is necessary for human survival. In western society, people value individualism. Thus, there can be a negative connotation associated with being a part of a large group-- it undermines our uniqueness. Perhaps this value contributes to the stigma attached to the word "stereotype." Despite the flexible nature of stereotypes, I do believe that they reflect some truthfulness. Although not everyone can subscribe to a certain stereotype, they are blueprints used to compare between groups of people. In my opinion, stereotyping is not wrong, however one should be willing and able to modify stereotypes accordingly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stereotypes develop out of crude generalization of repeated observation. They are often negative, it seems to me, because they develop out of an observation of a negative trait or quality perceived frequently enough in a "group" to become established as a stereotype. If I notice repeatedly that Laplanders stiff on tipping, and perhaps I'm not the only one, then voila, stereotype. This may not be fair to every individual Laplander, but unless one breaks the pattern I have no reason not to hold the grudge. I agree with fraea in that stereotyping is not inherently wrong, but fluidity in one's opinions are crucial to avoid unfounded stereotypes that distort understanding.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Trent,

    This post brought up so many good points, but I feel people stereotype in order to make themselves feel as though they are the better person. Without stereotypes there wouldn't be as many divisions of people. I think that stereotypes at some points aren't always negative, like saying someone is the stereotypical jock. At the same time with that, there comes the idea that athletes are not as smart as others. I feel as though people can break out of these stereotypes if we choose not to conform to them. Once this starts to happen, then, we might see stereotypes shifting, and depicting a more positive light.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with you in that stereotypes are never going to fully dissipate, and that they are an inevitable part of living in a society. However, I think that the problem arises when people take them too literally. For example, I assume that some people may not share the same interests as I do because they put themselves into a certain subculture. This is because they have chosen to behave, dress, or simply present themselves in a manner that coincides with said culture. I don't believe that being able to synthesize this makes me a bad person or someone who directly labels others. Obviously, there are always exceptions, particularly in the case of racial stereotypes, which are often degrading and should be ignored. However, I think it's important to make a distinction between noting intentional differences and totally displaced racial biases.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Stereotypes are a very interesting subject and this is very bold for you to tackle this one.

    I have mixed feelings about stereotypes because I feel they are functional but I can also see how they can be detrimental to one's existence. When considering this topic I think about essentialism and how it applies to our individual views of our race and others. Essentialism is when one attributes one set of characteristics to a group or entity and everyone of that group must possess these characteristics. In other words these characteristics are the "essence" of their existence. We adopt this idea of essentialism with a binary mindset that in order to be a part of one race we must not possess characteristics of another. These characteristics that we associate with certain races are nothing more than stereotypes which don't actually apply to any certain group exclusively.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Stereotypes to some extent are absolutely necessary, if for no other reason then to make sense of the world. If we went blindly into meeting each new person as a completely unique unit, social interaction would be chaos. Not to say that stereotypes are always accurate, but they give us patterns with which to structure social norms. Based on a stereotype about women, a man might not compliment a womans breasts to her face, but would probably whisper it to the guy next to him. And not all women, but a very large portion, appreciate that. I don't know that it's true that stereotypes are intrinsically linked with value judgments. Sometimes they instill a little bit of order.

    ReplyDelete
  10. As all of the previous comments have stated, stereotypes are a fact of our life. I am not sure if people know the term (just because I don't know what is covered in other departments) but In sociology we use a term called reification, which the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines as "to regard (something abstract) as a material or concrete thing." How this applies here is that we use stereotypes to reify a subject and make sense of it through giving it a label thus defining the subject. This label carries preconceptions which we have already formed. Stereotypes come in to the conversation of race as our own conceptions of the words we use to label the races. As long as our own foregrounding provides us with negative connotations regarding the labels we use, we will continue a cycle of racism. So we then turn to change these views and alter our own foregrounding. This is difficult, but even through simply reading this material and reflecting on it we are able to inform and position ourselves in a manner which we can be reflexive and at least attempt to make a conscious effort to dispel our own misconceptions.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.